Kutip dari: skuler pada Mei 08, 2009, 08:59:28 PM
lumayan ni... kok pemda turki ga jadiin situs tesbut t4 wisata y.!?!..
trus perahunya direkonstruksi kaya waktu jaman nuh gitu...
pasti banyak ni orang2 yg pengen liat ini kapal...

Pada awalnya, tempat ini restrictid banget buat khalayak umum. Hanya kalangan militer saja yang boleh ke sana. Tapi perkembangan berikutnya (denger-denger) udah dibuka sebagai tempat wisata (namanya juga denger-denger)

Kutip dari: skuler pada Mei 08, 2009, 08:59:28 PM
trus perahunya direkonstruksi kaya waktu jaman nuh gitu...

Soal itu gw udah punya gambar digital 3d. Dengan konstruksi yang pastinya mencengangkan para insinyur. Tapi kalu bentuk replika sih ukuran sesungguhnya sih belom

Nope, itu hoax.

Gambarnya diambil di 2 tempat. Yang satu di Turki, yang satu di Iran.

@ gundul: gmana? ada bantahan?

Kutip dari: Lunaris pada Mei 10, 2009, 04:23:42 AM
Gambarnya diambil di 2 tempat. Yang satu di Turki, yang satu di Iran.

bisa tolong jelasin lebih detail gitu...

Kutip dari: profesor gundul! pada Mei 11, 2009, 10:02:41 PMbisa tolong jelasin lebih detail gitu...

apanya? sumbernya?

John R. Baumgardner, seorang ilmuwan dan kreasionis yang anti teori evolusi, dan mempercayai kebenaran banjir besar Nuh. Ketemu di wiki:

Kutip
Baumgardner, however, did not support Wyatt and Fasold claim that the boat-shaped 'object' was the Ark. In a letter to Gary Amirault he wrote:

"Regarding my position on the Durupinar site, the core drilling we performed in 1988 settled the issue as far as I am concerned--the site is a natural formation, nothing more, produced by a mud slide as mud flowed around a ridge-shaped block of basement rock that is still present inside the resulting boat-shaped form. My position on the many other claims and questions is accurately represented in the article in the September 1992 issue of Creation Magazine, Volume 14, Number 4, entitled 'Amazing Ark Expose' by Dr. Andrew Snelling that critiqued assertions by Ron Wyatt, David Fasold, and others that the site indeed contained remains of the Ark. I refer people on the CRSnet who are interested in the controversy to this article. The footage of me in the video that has been shown several times on U.S. and British television during the last three years reflects my early enthusiasm about the possibility of a connection of the site with Noah's Ark, but it does not accurately represent my very firm conclusions reached after the extensive geophysical investigations we conducted at the site in 1987 and 1988. I realize this answer is brief, but I hope it is clear I am convinced the remains of the Ark must be somewhere else, that such remains are emphatically not associated with this boat-shaped formation. The central claims Wyatt and Fasold have been making about the site are bogus."

oooo0000ooo..... ternyata cuman formasi bebatuan yg tebentuk sedemikian rupa shingga bebentuk seperti perahuuuu.... wele2.....

jadi sejak kapan manusia memakai logam? nabi daud taon brapa si? nabi nuh?

wahh... gw di boongin

wkwkwkwkwk.... laen kali hati2 oom....

di mars jg banyak bbatuan yg bebentuk seperti struktur hasil pembangunan... padahal ternyata terbentuk scara alami....