ForSa punya logo baru!! Ada komen?
0 Anggota dan 1 Pengunjung sedang melihat topik ini.
...However, your headline is problematic for anyone with a knowledge of the scientific method or an interest in the philosophy of science.In the first instance, it is a fundamental tenet of science that no experiment can ‘prove a theory right’, as Einstein himself (and Karl Popper) frequently acknowledged. Even the most ingenious experiment can only offer evidence in support of a theory –‘right so far’ (and this is leaving aside the difficult question of the interpretation of scientific data). The error is not simply a question of headline shorthand as it is repeated in the opening sentence of the article; ‘..a ..NASA spacecraft has confirmed general relativity’....
Gravity Probe B — Final Experimental ResultsGyroscope rN-S (Geodetic Measurement) rW-E (Frame-Dragging Measurement)Individual Gyroscope ResultsGyroscope #1 -6,588.6±31.7 mas/yr -41.3±24.6 mas/yrGyroscope #2 -6,707.0±64.1 mas/ yr -16.1±29.7 mas/yrGyroscope #3 -6,610.5±43.2 mas/yr -25.0±12.1 mas/yrGyroscope #4 -6,588.7±33.2 mas/yr -49.3±11.4 mas/yrWeighted-Average Results for All Four GyroscopesAll Gyroscopes -6,601.8±18.3 mas/yr -37.2±7.2 mas/yrSchiff-Einstein Predicted Theoretical ValuesTheoretical Gyroscope -6,606.1 mas/yr -39.2 mas/yr