Penulis Topik: Science vs Pseudoscience (Dibaca 19092 kali)

Pi-One · « **Jawab #15 pada:** Desember 22, 2009, 09:33:58 PM »

Sekarang kita punya kriteria baru akan sesuatu ilmiah atau gak.

Gimana kalau ada dua artikel yang diterima jurnal ilmiah, dan keduanya bertentangan?

Kutip

Science Definition

The word science comes from the Latin "scientia," meaning knowledge.

How do we define science? According to Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, the definition of science is "knowledge attained through study or practice," or "knowledge covering general truths of the operation of general laws, esp. as obtained and tested through scientific method [and] concerned with the physical world."

What does that really mean? Science refers to a system of acquiring knowledge. This system uses observation and experimentation to describe and explain natural phenomena. The term science also refers to the organized body of knowledge people have gained using that system. Less formally, the word science often describes any systematic field of study or the knowledge gained from it.

What is the purpose of science? Perhaps the most general description is that the purpose of science is to produce useful models of reality.

Most scientific investigations use some form of the scientific method. You can find out more about the scientific method here.

Science as defined above is sometimes called pure science to differentiate it from applied science, which is the application of research to human needs. Fields of science are commonly classified along two major lines:
- Natural sciences, the study of the natural world, and
- Social sciences, the systematic study of human behavior and society.

The Houw Liong · « **Jawab #16 pada:** Desember 23, 2009, 02:56:11 PM »

Makalah yang diterima dalam jurnal internasional konsisten dengan hukum fisika fundamental atau merupakan hasil pengamatan/observasi yang cermat mengikuti tata cara ilmiah.

Tidak mungkin dua artikel yang kontradiksi ada dalam satu jurnal ilmiah dalam waktu bersamaan , kecuali waktunya berlainan sehingga ada fakta baru atau paradigma baru yang berkembang sehingga artikel yang baru mengoreksi yang lama.

Sains mengenai kesadaran (consciuosness) adalah bidang yang baru yang belum termasuk dalam science definition yang sudah kuno.

PSYCHOLOGY OF CONSCIOUSNESS

-- compiled by Daniel Kortenkamp, Ph.D. (May 2000)

Consciousness (General). [ see also: THEORIES OF CONSCIOUSNESS / BRAIN-MIND RELATIONSHIP ]
Farthing, G. (1992). The psychology of consciousness. [ BF 311 .F36 ]
Cohen, J., & Schooler, J. (Eds.). (1997). Scientific approaches to consciousness. [ BF 311 .S3876 ]
Leonard, G. (1995). Alternative relatities: The paranormal, the mystic and the transcendent in human experience. [ BF 1031 .G36 ]
Wallace, B., & Fisher, L. (1991). Consciousness and behavior (3rd ed.). [ BF 311 .W26669 ]
Tart, C. (Ed.). (1990). Altered states of consciousness (3rd ed.). [ BF 1045 .A48 A47 ]
Taylor, E. (1996). William James on consciousness beyond the margin. [ BF 109 .J28 T38 ]
Pekala, R. (1991). Quantifying consciousness: An empirical approach. [ BF 311 .P319 ]
Humphrey, N. (1992). A history of the mind. [ BF 311 .H777 ]
Miletich, J. (1988). States of awareness: An annotated bibliography. [Ref Z 7204. C64 M54 ]
Wolman, B., & Ullman, M. (Eds.) (1986). Handbook of states of consciousness. [ BF 311 .H3351 ]
Reed, G. (1988). The psychology of anomalous experience: A cognitive approach. [ BF 491 .R431 ]
Blakemore, C., Greenfield, S. (eds.). (1987). Mindwaves: Thoughts on intelligence, identity, and consciousness. [ BF 311 .M554 ]
Hobson, J. (Ed.). (1989). Abnormal states of brain and mind. [ RC 341 .A26 ]
Hobson, J. (Ed.). (1988). States of brain and mind. [ QP 360 .S73 ]
J. of consciousness studies: Controversies in science and the humanities (1994- ) Bi-monthly
Noetic Sciences Bulletin (1973- ) Quarterly [ Institute of Noetic Sciences ]
Noetic sciences review [formerly Noetic news ] (1987- ) Quarterly newsletter [ Institute of Noetic Sciences ]
Consciousness and cognition (1992- ) Quarterly
J. of mind and behavior (1980- ) Quarterly
ReVision (1978- ) Quarterly
Anthropology of consciousness (1985- ) Quarterly [ Society for the Anthropology of Consciousness ]
Brain/mind: A bulletin of breakthroughs (1976- ) [ formerly New sense bulletin ] Monthly newsletter
Mindfield: A quarterly source journal for consciousness ( ) Quarterly
PSYCHE: An interdisciplinary journal of research on consciousness (1993- ) Quarterly [ electronic journal ]
PSYCHE: An interdisciplinary journal of research on consciousness (1995- ) Bi-annually [ paper version of the electronic journal ]
Assoc. for the Scientific Study of Consciousness [ http:/www.phil.vt.edu/ASSC/ ]
Phenomena of the Psyche and Other Inexplicable Anomalies [ http://www.execpc.com/~mholmes/front.html ]
Altered States of Consciousness [ http://www.utu.fi/~jounsmed/asc/asc.html#1 ]
alt.consciousness [ there are many Usenet newsgroups which begin alt.consciousness ]

The Houw Liong · « **Jawab #17 pada:** Desember 23, 2009, 03:20:59 PM »

Parapsychology or transpersonal psychology:

First let me define some terms: When I say "parapsychology," I intend to mean the field of scientific research carried out by people trained in some recognized scientific discipline (almost none are trained in parapsychology per se, due to lack of specialized programs, but come from biology, physics, psychology, etc.), research focused on understanding the nature of phenomena like telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, psychokinesis (PK), psychic healing, etc. The emphasis here is on high quality, controlled laboratory experiments that produce experiments up to or (typically) exceeding the standards in other recognized fields of scientific inquiry, as well as a willingness to accept negative results (psychic functioning often fails to manifest in real life!), because the search for truth is far more important than one's own beliefs. Almost all investigators working in scientific parapsychology are members of the international Parapsychological Association , with full membership usually requiring a Ph.D. degree in some recognized field and evidence of published contributions to the field in refereed (meaning competent colleagues have judged the work to meet basic scientific standards), scientific journals. Fairly detailed information about scientific parapsychology and generally agreed on findings to date can be found via links from my web archives . Other important sources are the guide to parapsychology on the internet at http://www.ed.ac.uk/~ejua35/parapsy.htm , from the Parapsychological Association , and from the Parapsychology .

Pi-One · « **Jawab #18 pada:** Desember 23, 2009, 05:12:52 PM »

Aku belum pernah menemukan bahwa sains sekarang harus memasukkan ilmu spikologi ataupun pandangan filosofis agama. Jika begitu, sudah pasti aku akan meninggalkan dunia sains, karena aku anti pada yang namanya dogma...

Anda ngotot apa yang anda jabarkan bukan pseudo sains, tapi lucunya sebagian yang anda jabarkan justru memenuhi definisi pseudo sains di awal thread.

ksatriabajuhitam · « **Jawab #19 pada:** Desember 23, 2009, 08:50:13 PM »

@THL: wah asik nih Pak kalo papernya bisa di-share

(mode minta gratisan ON)

segala sesuatu yang terjadi, harus memiliki penjelasan. kita tidak boleh menutup mata terhadap
fenomena yang memang terjadi; karena itulah kita berusaha mencari penjelasan.

itu juga membuat saya sebetulnya tidak suka ada istilah science dan pseudo-science, karena cepat atau lambat science akan merambah "dunia yang tidak kita ketahui".
begitu pula peng-kaplingan ilmu, sewajarnya lah semuanya memiliki interkoneksi.

The Houw Liong · « **Jawab #20 pada:** Desember 24, 2009, 06:37:41 AM »

Pandangan Pie One ketinggalan jaman. Baca karya pemenang hadiah Nobel.

Josephson became a fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge in 1962[1] before moving to the United States to take a position as Research Assistant Professor at the University of Illinois.[1] He returned to Cambridge University in 1967 as an Assistant Director of Research at the Cavendish Laboratory and then a professor of physics in 1974,[1] a position he retained until his retirement in 2007.
Since 1983 Josephson has been appointed a Visiting Professor at various institutions including the Wayne State University in 1983,[1] the Indian Institute of Science in 1984[1] and the University of Missouri-Rolla in 1987.[1]
Josephson was a member of the Theory of Condensed Matter (TCM) Group, a theoretical physics group at the Cavendish Laboratory, for much of his research career.[5] While working at TCM group he was jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1973 while still only a Reader in Physics. He shared the award with Japanese physicist Leo Esaki and American physicist Ivar Giaever, who each received 1/4 of the prize, with 1/2 going to Josephson.[6] Unusually, along with Josesphson, neither Esaki nor Giaever held professorships at the time of the award. It is rare that academics ranked below professors win the prestigious prize.[7]
Josephson also directed the Mind–Matter Unification Project in the TCM Group.[8] He currently sits on the Advisory and Editorial Board of NeuroQuantology: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Neuroscience and Quantum Physics[9]

Pi-One · « **Jawab #21 pada:** Desember 24, 2009, 10:59:55 AM »

Yeah yeah, dan HY pasti senang karena ada kesempatan dia jadi ilmuwan yang diakui berdasar definisi sains anda nanti

The Houw Liong · « **Jawab #22 pada:** Desember 28, 2009, 02:53:51 PM »

Kutip dari: Pi-One pada Desember 24, 2009, 10:59:55 AM

Yeah yeah, dan HY pasti senang karena ada kesempatan dia jadi ilmuwan yang diakui berdasar definisi sains anda nanti

Keliru lagi !!!
Ilmuwan adalah orang yang bekerja berdasarkan logika formal dan observasi dan karyanya bisa diterima dalam jurnal ilmiah.

Pi-One · « **Jawab #23 pada:** Desember 29, 2009, 09:11:29 AM »

Kutip dari: The Houw Liong pada Desember 28, 2009, 02:53:51 PM

Keliru lagi !!!
Ilmuwan adalah orang yang bekerja berdasarkan logika formal dan observasi dan karyanya bisa diterima dalam jurnal ilmiah.

Dan bekerja dengan pandangan naturalis dan menggunakan metode ilmiah.

*Wah, untung THL bukan dosenku, kalau iya aku gak akan pernah lulus mata kuliahnya

do2y · « **Jawab #24 pada:** Januari 16, 2010, 04:06:32 PM »

TUGAS SAINS BUKAN UNTUK MENGHAKIMI SESUATU TP HARUS MEMBUKTIKAN SESUATU.JD ALANGKAH BIJAK SESUATU ITU DISIKAPI/DIBUKTIKN DG HATI2 DAN MENGHARGAI HIPOTESA EMPIRIS.JGN SAMPAI MENODAI DOGMA/SIKAP KITA SBG PEMBUNUH THD (SAINTIS)GALILEO/BRUNO YG MRP AWAL KEMENANGAN SAINTIS.TQ

mudhy axl Trump · « **Jawab #25 pada:** Januari 19, 2010, 09:40:08 PM »

Kutip dari: do2y pada Januari 16, 2010, 04:06:32 PM

TUGAS SAINS BUKAN UNTUK MENGHAKIMI SESUATU TP HARUS MEMBUKTIKAN SESUATU.JD ALANGKAH BIJAK SESUATU ITU DISIKAPI/DIBUKTIKN DG HATI2 DAN MENGHARGAI HIPOTESA EMPIRIS.JGN SAMPAI MENODAI DOGMA/SIKAP KITA SBG PEMBUNUH THD (SAINTIS)GALILEO/BRUNO YG MRP AWAL KEMENANGAN SAINTIS.TQ

Mantap Gan,,,,,setuju

parmin · « **Jawab #26 pada:** Maret 06, 2010, 09:58:09 AM »

Kutip dari: Pi-One pada Desember 23, 2009, 05:12:52 PM

Aku belum pernah menemukan bahwa sains sekarang harus memasukkan ilmu spikologi ataupun pandangan filosofis agama. Jika begitu, sudah pasti aku akan meninggalkan dunia sains, karena aku anti pada yang namanya dogma...

Anda ngotot apa yang anda jabarkan bukan pseudo sains, tapi lucunya sebagian yang anda jabarkan justru memenuhi definisi pseudo sains di awal thread.

katanya anti dogma kok masih mengikuti teory kaki darwin yang penuh dogma wahh kepripun njenengan mencla mencle

Arifin I · « **Jawab #27 pada:** Mei 20, 2010, 10:54:59 AM »

to : teman2 semua yg ter cayang...
kok masih ada obrolan gini sih... bukanya semua dah jelas, antara pseudo -science.

baca cermat2 contoh berikut:
dulu radiasi (peng-ion) ditakuti, tidak kelihatan, tidak berbau, tidak berasa dsb. tapi dia mematikan bisa membuat apa aja jd mati seperti seperti jin ganas

tapi sekarang... ternyata dia adalah paket2 energi yang bisa termanfaatkan dan terkendalikan...
jadi semua bisa dilogika dan bisa dibuktikan adanya
seperti halnya Tuhan, Dia bisa dibuktikan keberadaannya/kebenarannya dengan fisika atom inti (FAI) atau ilmu2 yang lain
jadi klo sampai hari ini tidak bersujut pd Nya yeeee

:'(

Pi-One · « **Jawab #28 pada:** Mei 20, 2010, 01:32:48 PM »

Maka sebelum minta diterima, buktikan dulu. Katanya bisa

Arifin I · « **Jawab #29 pada:** Mei 21, 2010, 04:23:36 PM »

nulis panjang susah ntar ndak malah salah persepsi, kapan2 aja klo face to face

lebih jelas

Artikel Sains

Aku Cinta ForSa

Pranala Luar

ShoutBox!

Penulis Topik: Science vs Pseudoscience (Dibaca 19092 kali)

Topik Terkait